When universities consolidate, the comms plan is always the last thing built
The University of Adelaide and the University of South Australia completed their merger in January 2026, creating one of Australia's five largest universities.
The branding alignment, the style guides, the unified look and feel: these are the tip of the iceberg. The communications plan is where people learn the change, understand their place in it, and begin to scaffold the nuance that no template can carry. It is easy to point to the shiny outputs: a newsletter that lands better, a set of saved templates that give form to the message. But a comms plan shows everyone the why, the how, the when, the where, and connects each of those to strategic goals. Start there, and your tactical outputs will find their purpose.
The question this article is asking sits alongside that work, not in opposition to it.
External campaigns land harder when the internal architecture is already in place: when researchers understand what the merged institution stands for, when professional staff know their role in the story, when students hear a coherent message before they see an advertisement. Building that internal alignment is a different discipline from brand and media. It requires a communications plan that is built alongside the strategy, not after it.
I have done that work, and the pattern of what happens when it is done well is consistent. Internal stakeholders understand their roles. They know how to add content, their voice, and their value to the external messaging.
What could have been a twenty-person communications effort multiplies overnight. When people start asking how they could contribute, or seeking clarity on where the strategy is heading, that is the most reliable signal the plan is working. Not a document sitting in a top drawer. A living architecture that people want to be part of.
For universities, the stakes are high. Researchers have deep loyalty to their disciplines and their institutions. Professional staff have invested in cultures that took years to build. Students are making decisions about enrolments, candidatures, and careers based on what they understand the merged institution to stand for. If the internal communications strategy arrives after the strategic decisions are settled, you are not engaging stakeholders. You are managing them. Most people on the receiving end can tell.
The Adelaide University merger is the most prominent recent example, but it is not the only conversation happening in the sector.
Financial pressure, changing enrolment patterns, and policy uncertainty are producing consolidation discussions elsewhere. Institutions watching from the sidelines might ask the question now, while there is still time: if we were to go through significant structural change, is our communications function ready to lead the process, not explain it after the fact?
The answer, more often than not, is no. Not because the people are not capable, but because the communications function is brought in too late to shape rather than catch up.
For more information
Stakeholder engagement isn't a communications tool. It's a trust tool
The A to Z of External Engagement: Why Balance Matters More Than Volume
Subscribe to Making Impact Made Easy
